Even so, transphobia is a central part of the Trump presidencyâs legislative agenda. One week after he was sworn into office in January 2025, his White House issued an executive order that branded gender-affirming care as âmutilationâ and ordered the Department of Health to remove a 2022 definition that acknowledged gender-affirming care to be âcrucial to overall health and well-beingâ of transgender and nonbinary children and adolescents. While a court order days later forced the Trump administration to reluctantly reinstate it, along with relevant guidance and literature, its restoration did not signal lasting change.
Within three months, the attorney general had instructed the Department of Justice to prosecute healthcare providers offering gender-affirming care under the federal Stop FGM Act. Taylor-Greeneâs bill is now seeking to codify this instruction and make it legal and mandatory for prosecutors to begin opening cases under this conflation.
âSurvivors fought really hard in this country for many years to get that law,â said Kaitlin Mitchell, policy and advocacy coordinator of the US End FGM/C Network, who opposes Taylor-Greeneâs proposed legislation. âSo when we use the word âmutilationâ to mean gender-affirming care and female genital mutilation, or to refer to both, weâre taking away from the specific practice of FGM.â
The new bill has been endorsed by several groups opposed to equal rights, including three with links to Trumpâs authoritarian blueprint Project 2025. But the weaponisation of FGM has been ignored in discussions about it. âIn all of the debates that happened on the house floor and in the rules committee the day before, in everything that we're seeing online, one thing that has not come up once is the impact of this bill on FGM-C survivors,â said Caitlin LeMay, the executive director of the US End FGM-C Network.
LeMay added: âWe are also blurring the lines around consent and bodily autonomy, because FGM is a non-consensual form of violence against children, and gender affirming care is an evidence-based form of life-saving healthcare.â
Bowers of the Mills-Peninsula Medical Center said gender-affirming care had been found to be beneficial for those who receive it. âThere is supporting medical evidence, and when you talk to these families and to the individuals themselves, there is improved psychosocial function and self-image,â she told openDemocracy.
âThe lack of access to medical care for trans youth causes an increase in suicidality,â she added.
A 2023 study by the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law found that 42% of trans adults in the US have attempted suicide â four times as many as cisgender adults â and more than 81% have thought about it.
Trans young people are particularly vulnerable, with state-level anti-trans laws â such as those limiting access to gender-affirming care, or to bathrooms and sports teams that match a personâs gender identity â leading to a rise of up to 72% in incidents of past-year suicide attempts among transgender and nonbinary youth, according to a 2024 study by the Trevor Project, which works in suicidal prevention for LGBTIQ+ young people.
On the other hand, several other surveys by the Trevor Project have found that welcoming homes, schools and access to care for gender-non-conforming children and young people reduce suicide risks and mental health suffering. Similarly, suicidal ideas fell drastically among trans kids and young adults (between 12 and 20 years old) who began receiving hormone therapy, a study published last year by the Journal of Paediatrics found.
Yet politicians in 26 states have already banned proper health care for trans youth â and the situation is only getting worse.
âIt's having a huge effect,â Bowers told openDemocracy, ânot only psychologically on the patients who now feel even more distanced from the medical care, but that's an overview of what's generally happening in the erosion of trust in medical care, in science, in the data and the experience that we have with a wide variety of issuesâ.
In some cases, providers can lose their licences or be charged with a felony.
âThis is a continuation of the practices that conservatives in our current government have been drifting towards, inserting lawyers and politicians between doctors and medical decision-makingâ, Bowers added.