The victims believe the RMP’s failings were deliberate.
“It was too messy for them, if it came out,” the other said. “We needed to be shut down. They don’t want to find him guilty because then they would be liable.”
Our discovery throws into doubt the military’s decision to claim it could not prove jurisdiction and drop its investigation. While the document we uncovered is not definitive proof of employment, it raises serious questions about the extent and effort of the RMP’s inquiries in this case, and in other cases of child sex offences in army schools that we have reviewed.
Grooming and abuse
In 1981, Anne* and Jane* were ten years old and attending a British Army-run primary school for the children of troops stationed in Germany. There, they recall, the charismatic and confident caretaker seemed untouchable.
“He had the run of the school,” Anne recalled. “There was a sense he had a lot of power. He would walk around with no top on, he would watch the girls’ dance rehearsals.”
Jane has similar memories. “He had free rein over the whole school,” she said. “He had so much freedom.” She described how the caretaker would “extract” them from their classrooms by telling teachers he needed helpers for a mundane task, then sexually abuse them.
“We would be taken out of that teaching environment,” Jane recalled. “He would lead us down the corridor to his room and abuse us. He was so good at it. There was no way we were the only victims.”
Members of a Facebook group for the school’s alumni also vividly remember the caretaker. In posts seen by openDemocracy, one recalled how, as girls, they would perform the 1979 Raceys’ hit Some Girls to him. Another woman posted how he would watch their dance routines, while others remembered him giving the girls’ sports teams lifts to and from fixtures in his car.
Besides each other, Anne and Jane told no one about the abuse they experienced, not even their parents. The pair moved on to separate schools and eventually lost contact, with Jane joining the armed forces and Anne pursuing a civilian career. Both had children of their own. But the legacy of abuse haunted them. “It’s affected me in so many ways,” said Jane.
Four decades later, Anne was ready to speak out. In 2018, she contacted the Truth Project, a public initiative that offered survivors of child sexual abuse at state-run institutions the chance to anonymously tell their stories as part of the UK government’s independent inquiry.
Anne shared how she had been abused at the hands of the caretaker, gave the project permission to refer her statement to the police, and waited.
A catalogue of failings
An administrative error by the Truth Project meant it would be three years before Anne received a response. In 2021, the Defence Serious Crimes Unit – then known as Special Investigations Branch – of the Royal Military Police finally opened an investigation into her allegations.
“The whole process has been disempowering from the beginning,” Anne said. From the outset, she explained, officers seemed more concerned about establishing whether they had jurisdiction over the case than investigating what was going on in the school at that time.
“It feels deeply inhuman the way the police responded to us, which given the nature of the prolonged sexual abuse we suffered in the confines of a British military school adds insult to injury.”
The police told Anne that they needed a second victim to “clarify and confirm” her experience, so she told them about her schoolfriend.
It would be two years before the RMP located Jane. Out of the blue, a police officer turned up on the doorstep of her father, whom she had never told about the abuse, and asked for her whereabouts.
“It sent me into a spiral,” Jane said. “I then had to decide whether to lie to my parents and construct a scenario explaining why the police had come to their house. Or I would, after 43 years, have to tell them about the abuse.”
Jane described how she felt “ambushed”.
Anne had experienced something similar. At the start of the investigation, she told the RMP that she did not want them to speak to her parents until the jurisdiction issue was resolved.
“I didn’t want my elderly parents to know. The police then told me it was okay to go ahead with the interview, so I assumed this meant they had jurisdiction,” she said. “They hadn’t. They interviewed my parents for nothing.”
In July 2024, the RMP closed the investigation, informing Anne and Jane via a five-minute phone call. The case was referred to the German authorities, who in May 2025 said they could not investigate due to the statute of limitations on child sex offences.
The military police never interviewed the suspect – a decision that Anne and Jane have been given no explanation for. They told openDemocracy that they feel that the RMP was “running down the clock” on approaching the suspect, as he is now elderly with multiple health issues.
This failure to interview deprived the pair of a Victim’s Right to Review, where a victim can challenge a decision not to prosecute a case, and which can only be done when a suspect has been interviewed under caution.
The RMP also failed to interview another member of the school’s staff, whose name was passed over to officers after they told one of the victims that they believed all staff at the school were hired by the MoD and paid the National Insurance contributions required of British employees.
In fact, besides Anne, Jane and their parents, the police only interviewed one other person during their three-and-a-half-year investigation: a senior member of the school’s staff. In interview notes released to Anne by the MoD, which she shared with openDemocracy, the staff member described the caretaker as a “loveable rogue” who babysat his children.
This was far from Jane’s experience. She described the caretaker as the “most vile person. He was so controlling and he made our lives hell.”
“I find it extraordinary that the only person they interviewed was a staff member who is not going to say he always had his suspicions about someone he worked with,” said Anne. “The police then used that as a reason not to interview the caretaker.”
Information from the case released to one of the victims suggests that the RMP’s investigations were minimal. The force provided a list of the archives and data collections that it consulted as part of its investigation, which reveals that it never examined the military’s British Families Education Service archive, stored at the University College London.
